Key result
Low-dose radiotherapy achieves complete remission in relapsed intracardiac myeloid sarcoma.
Why the study?
Intracardiac myeloid sarcoma relapse in AML is rare and optimal treatment strategies including radiotherapy dosing are not well established.
Case Report (n=1)
A modest radiotherapy dose of 24 Gy can achieve complete remission and good local control of myeloid sarcoma with cardiac involvement.
Low-dose radiotherapy may relieve symptomatic intracardiac myeloid sarcoma relapse; leaves open its role in post-HSCT AML management.
We present a rare case of intracardiac myeloid sarcoma (MS) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and who responds completely well to low-dose radiotherapy. This 19-year-old young man initially presented with AML and received standard chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, he developed intracardiac isolated MS relapse with the presentation of exertional dyspnea and superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome 3 years later. He then received radiotherapy with 24 Gy at a 12 daily fractions using forward "field in field" intensity modulated radiotherapy technique. He dramatically had improved clinical symptoms, and complete remission was achieved one month after completing radiotherapy. Our result is in line with anecdotal case reports showed that radiotherapy with 15 Gy in 10 fractions or with 24 Gy in 12 fractions resulted in good response and less toxicity of 2 cases of MS with cardiac involvement. These results indicate that a modest radiotherapy dose, 24 Gy, achieves good local control of MS with cardiac involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2016) conducted a case report in Intracardiac myeloid sarcoma of acute myeloid leukemia (n=1). Radiotherapy was evaluated on Clinical symptoms and remission. Low-dose radiotherapy (24 Gy in 12 fractions) achieved complete remission and improved clinical symptoms in a 19-year-old man with intracardiac myeloid sarcoma relapse.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: