Key result
The generic isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions, with all 90% CIs for Cmax and AUC falling within the 80-125% range.
Why the study?
Is the test formulation of isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers?
RCT (n=56)
Open-label
Randomized (1:1 to T-R or R-T sequence)
No
Is the test formulation of isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet bioequivalent to the reference formulation in healthy Chinese volunteers?
The test formulation of isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions with comparable safety profiles.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports substitution of the test isosorbide mononitrate formulation; confirms bioequivalence to reference in this RCT.
Purpose: Isosorbide mononitrate was recommended for controlling anginal symptoms in patients with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence and safety of two formulations of oral isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablets in healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects and Methods: A randomized, open-label, two-period, single-center, single-dose clinical trial with crossover design was conducted in Zhejiang Hospital. Subjects received single dose 40-mg/tablet isosorbide mononitrate in each period with a 5-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected over 36 hours post-dose (Days 1 and 6). The plasma concentrations of isosorbide mononitrate were measured using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. Results: Fifty-six healthy subjects were enrolled. In the fasting group, the maximum plasma concentration (C max , mean ± SD) was 487.54 ± 69.17 ng/mL at 3.75 (1.50, 6.00) hours (median [min, max]) for test formulation, and 529.76 ± 84.64 ng/mL at 4.00 (2.50, 5.50) hours for reference formulation. In the fed group, C max was 501.46 ± 68.80 ng/mL at 4.50 (1.50, 6.50) hours for test formulation, and 535.14 ± 69.89 ng/mL at 4.00 (1.50, 9.00) hours for reference formulation. All 90% confidence intervals for C max , AUC 0-t and AUC 0-∞ fell within the 80– 125% bioequivalence range under both fasting and fed conditions. No drug-related serious adverse events were observed throughout the trial. Conclusion: The isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference formulation (Ismo ® retard) under both fasting and fed conditions, with comparable safety profiles. Both formulations were well tolerated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Healthy volunteers (n=56). Isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablets (test formulation) vs. Isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablets (reference formulation, Ismo retard) was evaluated on Bioequivalence based on maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) under fasting conditions (GMR 91.84%, 95% CI 88.6-95.19). The generic isosorbide mononitrate sustained-release tablet demonstrated bioequivalence to the reference formulation under both fasting and fed conditions, with all 90% CIs for Cmax and AUC falling within the 80-125% range.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: