Key result
Placental abruption complicated by preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction was associated with significantly poorer birth weight (p<0.001) and 1-minute Apgar scores (p=0.044).
Why the study?
Do preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction worsen clinical outcomes in singleton pregnancies with placental abruption?
Population
229 cases of placental abruption in singleton pregnancies from Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology and…
Comparison
Placental abruption with preeclampsia and/or… vs Placental abruption without preeclampsia and/or…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Abruption with preeclampsia/IUGR linked to worse neonatal outcomes; leaves open whether targeted monitoring improves prognosis.
Observational (n=229)
No
Do preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction worsen clinical outcomes in singleton pregnancies with placental abruption?
p-value: p=<0.001, 0.044, 0.001
Placental abruption complicated with preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction leads to poorer neonatal outcomes but similar maternal prognosis compared to abruption alone.
Ni et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Placental abruption (n=229). Preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction (ischemic placental disease) vs. Placental abruption without ischemic placental disease was evaluated on Neonatal outcomes including birth weight, Apgar score at 1 min, and gestation age at delivery (p=<0.001, 0.044, 0.001). Placental abruption complicated by preeclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction was associated with significantly poorer birth weight (p<0.001) and 1-minute Apgar scores (p=0.044).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: