Prospective cohort study demonstrates strong correlation between intestinal ultrasound and capsule endoscopy in active Crohn's disease, indicating ultrasound can effectively monitor treatment...
BACKGROUND: Small bowel video capsule endoscopy (SB-VCE) assesses mucosal inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD), while intestinal ultrasound (IUS) examines transmural involvement. We aimed to correlate SB-VCE with IUS in evaluating active CD and monitoring treatment response over time. METHODS: Patients with active SB-CD who initiated biologics were prospectively followed with fecal calprotectin (FC), SB-VCE, and IUS at baseline and after 14 and 52 weeks. The Lewis score (LS), Limberg index (LI), and terminal ileum bowel wall thickness (TI-BWT) were documented, and the International Bowel Ultrasound Segmental Activity Score (IBUS-SAS) was retrospectively calculated. Biochemical, endoscopic, and ultrasonographic remission were defined as FC < 150 μg/g, LS < 135, and LI < 2 + TI-BWT ≤ 3 mm, respectively. A therapeutic response for each index was defined as a 25% reduction compared to baseline. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were included (median age: 30 years [23-43], 49.3% male). The median interval between SB-VCE and IUS was 3 days (0-25). Initially, the LS strongly correlated with TI-BWT (r = 0.647, P < .001), LI (r = 0.597, P < .001), and IBUS-SAS (r = 0.647, P < .001), but these correlations weakened over time (TI-BWT: r = 0.344, P = .002; LI: r = 0.471, P = .001; IBUS-SAS: r = 0.236, P = .122). Moderate agreement was found between ultrasonographic and endoscopic treatment responses (LS and TI-BWT: K = 0.51, P = .015; LS and LI: K = 0.44, P = .063), with fair agreement for remission (K = 0.27, P = .006). TI-BWT best cutoffs for mild (LS ≥ 135) and moderate-to-severe (LS ≥ 790) inflammation were 2.25 mm and 3.6 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IUS measures are strongly correlated with VCE-inflammatory LS in active CD and may provide an assessment of endoscopic response and remission over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukashi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: