Key result
Proximal aortic neck dilatation post-EVAR linked to a ~29-fold higher risk of clinical events.
Why the study?
Proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) affects clinical outcomes but its incidence and impact require systematic summarization.
Does proximal aortic neck dilatation after EVAR increase the risk of adverse clinical events in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Systematic Review (n=9,721)
Does proximal aortic neck dilatation after EVAR increase the risk of adverse clinical events in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm?
Odds Ratio: 28.7 (95% CI 5.43–151.67)
Absolute Event Rate: 26% vs 2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Proximal aortic neck dilatation occurs in nearly a quarter of EVAR patients and is strongly associated with worse clinical outcomes, including endoleaks and reinterventions.
May warrant intensified post-EVAR neck surveillance; extends pooled observational data linking dilatation to adverse events.
PURPOSE: To provide an updated systematic literature review and summarize current evidence on proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: A review of the English-language medical literature from 1991 to 2015 was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies reporting AND after EVAR. Studies considered for inclusion and full-text review fulfilled the following criteria: (1) reported AND after EVAR, (2) included at least 5 patients, and (3) provided data on AND quantification. The search identified 26 articles published between 1998 and 2015 that encompassed 9721 patients (median age 71.8 years; 9439 men). RESULTS: AND occurred in 24.6% of patients (95% CI 18.6% to 31.8%) over a period ranging from 15 months to 9 years after EVAR. No significant dilatation of the suprarenal part of the aorta was reported by most studies. The incidence of combined clinical events (endoleak type I, migration, reintervention during follow-up) was higher in the AND group (26%) when compared with 2% in the group without AND (OR 28.7, 95% CI 5.43 to 151.67, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: AND affects a considerable proportion of EVAR patients and was related to worse clinical outcome, as indicated by increased rates of type I endoleak, migration, and reinterventions. Future studies should focus on a better understanding of the pathophysiology, predictors, and risk factors of AND, which could identify patients who may warrant a different EVAR strategy and/or a closer post-EVAR surveillance strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kouvelos et al. (2016) conducted a systematic review in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (n=9,721). Proximal aortic neck dilatation (AND) vs. No proximal aortic neck dilatation was evaluated on Combined clinical events (endoleak type I, migration, reintervention during follow-up) (OR 28.7, 95% CI 5.43 to 151.67, p=<0.001). Proximal aortic neck dilatation after EVAR was associated with a higher incidence of combined clinical events compared to no dilatation (26% vs 2%; OR 28.7, 95% CI 5.43-151.67, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: