Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The size distribution of mutual property‐liability insurers has a larger proportion of relatively small companies than the size distribution of stock property‐liability insurers. Small mutuals are unlikely to offer risk‐sharing advantages over conventional insurance, so these firms must offer their members other advantages. This article develops a theoretical model showing that these mutuals may offer advantages over conventional insurance in addressing problems of adverse selection. When adverse selection exists, conventional insurers may coexist with small mutuals. Small mutuals may be strictly preferred by low‐risk individuals. The size of the mutuals is limited by asymmetric information problems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ligon et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: