Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Currents in the 1.28 × 103 km Alaska oil pipeline, induced from the ionospheric, auroral electrojet, were measured at three sites, near Fairbanks, Paxson and Valdez, Alaska, using a gradient configuration of two fluxgate magnetometers. The observed pipeline current magnitudes, which reached 50 A during times of mild geomagnetic activity, displayed a linear relationship with the electric earth potential. Using the induction relationship between the electric and magnetic fields and the typical spectral composition of the geomagnetic field at high latitudes, I obtained a spectral appearance of the current that shows a maximum in the range of 4.5- to 10-min period. Near Fairbanks the pipeline current amplitudes, I (Amperes), could be represented, approximately, by I = 0.65 BxT−0.5, where Bx(nT) is the north—south geomagnetic field variation amplitude and T (min) is its apparent period. There is much less pipelines current at the sites south of Fairbanks. A previously established relationship between the local electric field and the planetary geomagnetic activity index, Ap, permitted a prediction of the pipeline current surge amplitudes in the Fairbanks region as approximately I = 5.0 Ap. Current surges larger than 500 A may be expected rather often in the Alaska pipeline during large geomagnetic storms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilbur H. Campbell (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: