In a recent issue of JABA, Kahng and Iwata (1998) reviewed the commercially available computerized systems for collecting real-time observational data.In discussing the value of computerized scoring, they suggested that these systems can improve reliability and accuracy of behavioral recording relative to more cumbersome paper-andpencil methods.Their review of the computerized systems showed that, because the systems collect real-time data, they all had the flexibility to record a number of different dimensions of the target behavior, including frequency (rate), duration, interresponse time, and latency, and could accommodate interval and time-sample recording.Although computerized data collection is becoming more widespread in behavior-analytic research, with more companies developing computerized scoring systems, there is another method available that researchers or clinicians can use to conduct real-time recording.We have been using a low-tech method that does not rely on computer systems but produces most of the same realtime outcomes as the computerized systems described by Kahng and Iwata.We use a real-time scoring system in our research on habit disorders in children and problem behaviors in individuals with mental retardation to record a variety of target behaviors.The system involves videotaping the subject in the observation session, typically in the home, school, or work setting,
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miltenberger et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: