Key result
EVAR with newer-generation stent-grafts linked to progressive iliac dilatation and ~13% endograft retraction.
Why the study?
Data on iliac artery dilatation and endograft retraction after EVAR mainly included older generation endografts, necessitating evaluation with newer generation stent-grafts.
Does endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts prevent iliac dilatation and endograft retraction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Cohort (n=52)
Does endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts prevent iliac dilatation and endograft retraction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms?
p-value: p=<.001
Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction remain common findings after endovascular aneurysm repair despite the use of newer generation endografts, necessitating meticulous surveillance.
Iliac dilatation persists despite newer endografts; leaves open whether device modifications or intensified surveillance improve outcomes.
Objective Data in literature suggest iliac artery dilatation and endograft retraction as complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. However, mainly older generation endografts were included. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the distal sealing zone chronological changes after endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts. Methods Clinical and radiological data of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms treated with endovascular aneurysm repair between January 2010 and December 2013 were reviewed. Measurements were made using volumetric reconstructions in the first and last available computed tomography angiography. Endpoints of the study were the presence of iliac dilatation and retraction of the endograft. Association with distal oversizing and sealing length was analyzed. Results Consecutive patients with a total of 52 common iliac arteries were included in the study (mean age 74.9 ± 6.8 years, four women (7.7%)). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years. The mean iliac diameter increased from 15.5 to 17.1 mm ( p < .001) in the first control computed tomography angiography and to 18.7 mm ( p < .001) in the last available computed tomography angiography. No endograft (Endurant by Medtronic (24/52; 46%), Excluder de Gore (23/52; 44%), Zenith by Cook (5/52; 9%)) was associated with dilatation ( p = .066) or iliac retraction ( p = .591). Two type Ib endoleaks were found (3.8%) and successfully treated with distal graft extension. An iliac branch retraction of ≥5 mm was identified in seven cases (13%). Iliac arteries treated with limbs of ≥24 mm in diameter dilated significantly more than the rest of limbs (5.37 mm versus 3.12 mm; p = .022). In the last available imaging, iliac dilatation was ≥20% in 28 cases (53.8%) and had exceeded the diameter of the implanted endograft in 20 cases (38.4%). Iliac dilatation (OR 15.11 per mm, p = .025) was identified as a risk factor for retraction ≥5 mm. Conclusion Iliac dilatation and endograft limb retraction are common findings after endovascular aneurysm repair despite the use of new generation endografts. Optimizing the iliac sealing length and meticulous computed tomography angiography surveillance are recommended especially in case of use ≥24 mm iliac stent-grafts to prevent possible complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taneva et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=52). Endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts was evaluated on Presence of iliac dilatation and retraction of the endograft (p=<.001). Endovascular aneurysm repair with newer generation stent-grafts was associated with significant iliac dilatation (15.5 to 18.7 mm, p<0.001) and a 13% rate of endograft retraction at 3.1 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: