Key result
Higher Life's Essential 8 score is linked to ~28% lower aortic stenosis risk per SD.
Why the study?
With global aging, the prevalence of calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) has increased and even mild CAVS elevates mortality risk, highlighting an urgent need for preventive strategies.
Does maintaining higher cardiovascular health as measured by Life's Essential 8 reduce the risk of incident calcific aortic valve stenosis across different polygenic risk strata in middle-aged and older adults?
Cohort (n=153,312)
Yes
Does maintaining higher cardiovascular health as measured by Life's Essential 8 reduce the risk of incident calcific aortic valve stenosis across different polygenic risk strata in middle-aged and older adults?
Maintaining ideal cardiovascular health (Life's Essential 8 score >=80) is linearly associated with lower calcific aortic valve stenosis risk and substantially mitigates the excess risk conferred by high polygenic susceptibility.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Higher LE8 scores may aid CAVS risk assessment across genetic strata; leaves open whether optimizing CVH prevents disease.
With global aging, the prevalence of calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) has significantly increased, and even mild CAVS elevates mortality risk, highlighting an urgent need for preventive strategies. In this study, we analyzed 153,312 participants from the UK Biobank. We found that a higher Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score was independently associated with a decreased CAVS risk [hazard ratio (HR)/standard deviation (SD): 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.76, P < 2E-16], whereas a higher genetic risk score was independently associated with an increased CAVS risk (HR/SD: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.54-1.71, P < 2E-16). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed approximately linear inverse associations between LE8 score and CAVS risk across all genetic risk groups. Although no multiplicative interaction was found between cardiovascular health (CVH) and genetic risk for CAVS, a significant additive interaction was identified (relative excess risk due to interaction: 3.77, 95% CI: 1.30-8.50). Among participants with high genetic risk, those with ideal CVH had a lower 10-year cumulative CAVS incidence rate than those with poor CVH (0.33% vs. 1.80%, P < 0.001). Besides, a significant multiplicative interaction was observed between LE8 score and age (P = 0.007). Similar trends were also observed for early-onset and late-onset CAVS. In conclusion, regardless of genetic risk groups, a higher LE8 score was associated with a lower CAVS risk in an approximately linear pattern. In particular, high genetic risk and poor CVH had a synergistic effect on CAVS risk, meaning that participants with high genetic risk and poor CVH would amplify their CAVS risk. Therefore, early and sustained optimization of CVH, particularly among those with high genetic risk, is essential to mitigate the risk of CAVS and its subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) (n=153,312). Life's Essential 8 (LE8) cardiovascular health score and polygenic risk score (PRS) vs. Lower LE8 score / Poor CVH (LE8 score 0-49) or Low genetic risk (bottom 20% PRS) was evaluated on Incident calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) (HR 0.72 per SD increase in LE8 score, 95% CI 0.68-0.76, p=< 2E-16). Higher Life's Essential 8 cardiovascular health scores were independently associated with a 28% lower risk of incident calcific aortic valve stenosis per standard deviation increase (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76, P < 2E-16) across all genetic risk strata.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: