This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Remittances have been promoted as a development tool because they can raise incomes and reduce poverty rates in developing countries.Remittances may also promote development by providing funds that recipients can spend on education or health care or invest in entrepreneurial activities.From a macroeconomic perspective, remittances can boost aggregate demand and thereby GDP as well as spur economic growth.However, remittances may also have adverse macroeconomic impacts by increasing income inequality and reducing labor supply among recipients.We use state-level data from Mexico during 2003-2007 to examine the aggregate effect of remittances on employment, wages, unemployment rates, the wage distribution, and school enrollment rates.While employment, wages and school enrollment have risen over time in Mexican states, these trends are not accounted for by increasing remittances.However, two-stage least squares specifications among central Mexican states suggest that remittances shift the wage distribution to the right, reducing the fraction of workers earning the minimum wage or less.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orrenius et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: