The authors describe a highly selective liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric (LC/MS) method for measurement of the immunosuppressive drug tacrolimus. A protein-free supernatant of a patient's whole-blood sample (500 microL) is applied to an Empore styrene-divinylbenzene (SDB-XC) disk cartridge (Varian Sample Preparation Products; Harbor City, CA) to isolate tacrolimus and the internal standard, ascomycin. The entire extraction is automated on the Gilson ASPEC XL4 (Gilson; Middleton, WI). Separation takes place on an octyldecyl (C18) high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) column maintained at 75 degrees C with a simple mobile phase of acetonitrile/water (90/10, v/v). An atmospheric pressure ionization (API)-electrospray ionization(ESI)-mass spectrometer (MS) is used for analysis. Detection is by selected ion monitoring (SIM) of the positively charged sodium adduct of tacrolimus and ascomycin, m/z 826.5 and 814.5, respectively. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) fragment ions of tacrolimus and ascomycin (m/z 616.4 and 604.4, respectively) are also monitored to enhance overall selectivity. Total run time is 1 minute per injection. A plot of chromatographic peak height ratio of m/z 826.5 to m/z 814.5 vs tacrolimus blood concentration is linear from the lowest limit of quantitation (0.3 microg/L) to at least 120.0 microg/L. Metabolites of tacrolimus and other immunosuppressive and commonly prescribed drugs do not interfere. Analytical recovery is 94% to 113% over a range of 4.4 to 41.0 microg/L. Between-run precision coefficients of variation (CV) are 3.6% to 4.2% over a range of 8.1 to 32.4 microg/L. Comparison data (n = 156) of the LC/MS method versus a commercial immunoassay (Abbott Tacrolimus IMx MEIA II) (Abbott; Chicago, IL) demonstrated that the tacrolimus concentration as measured by LC/MS = (0.912 x MEIA concentration) - 0.049; r2 = 0.968. This validated LC/MS method demonstrates significant advantages over conventional immunoassays and improves on the lower limit of detection, sensitivity, accuracy, and range of linearity. In the authors' laboratory, this method is approximately 60% less costly to perform than the most commonly implemented immunoassay. Together, the authors' daily clinical experience during 1 year and participation in a proficiency testing program has demonstrated that the method is robust and suitable for routine therapeutic monitoring of tacrolimus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lensmeyer et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: