Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: EBT-1, when scanned with a flatbed scanner for film readout. METHODS: Dose response curves were determined for 12 different beam qualities ranging from a10kVp x-ray beam to a 15MVp x-ray beam and include also two high energy electron beam qualities (6 and 18MeV). The dose responses measured as net optical density (netOD) for the different beam qualities were normalized to the response of a reference beam quality (6MVp). RESULTS: A strong systematic energy dependence of the film response was found. The lower the effective beam energy, the less sensitive the EBT-1 films get. The maximum decrease in dose for the same film response between the25kVp and 6MVp beam qualities was 44%. Additionally, a difference in energy dependence for different doses was discovered, meaning that higher doses show a smaller dependency on energy than lower doses. The maximum decrease in the normalized netOD was found to be 25% for a dose of 0.5Gy relative to the normalized netOD for 10Gy. Moreover, a scaling procedure is introduced, allowing the correction of the energy dependence for the investigated beam qualities and also for comparable x-ray beam qualities within the energy range studied. CONCLUSIONS: A strong energy dependence for EBT-1 radiochromic films was found. The films were readout with a flatbed scanner. If the effective beam energy is known, the energy dependence can be corrected with the introduced scaling procedure. Further investigation of the influence of the spectral band of the readout device on energy dependence is needed to understand the reason for the different energy dependences found in this and previous works.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richter et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: