This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Dye‐sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been attracted as a real class of building‐integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) owing to its natural controllable color transparency, working ability in diffuse light, and low‐cost fabrication. The low photoconversion efficiency (PCE) is the main obstacle for BIPV market. The bilayered structure based on mesoporous TiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs) along with TiO 2 blocking layer was introduced to obtain high PCE by optimizing the dye adsorption, avoid recombination via direct electrolyte contact, and enhance light‐harvesting ability by providing scattering centers. However, the bilayered structure based on mesoporous TiO 2 network offers inferior charge transfer, thus higher recombination and, consequently, low PCE. In our previous studies, we have developed graphene/TiO 2 blocking layer, graphene/TiO 2 transparent layer, and scattering layer and analyzed individually to improve the electron transport and reduce recombination. In the current work, we have demonstrated the integrated optimized photoelectrode‐based DSSCs via the above‐mentioned previously developed photoelectrode components with Pt and graphene/polyaniline (PANI) cost‐effective counter electrode. Optical property analysis and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) have shown that graphene‐modified optimum components of photoelectrode have effectively improved the electron transport and light‐harvesting ability. Electron lifetime, diffusion coefficient, and diffusion length have been increased by ~87%, ~20%, and ~11%, respectively, as compared to control DSSC based on commercial paste. Consequently, 5.94% of PCE was achieved, which is 20% higher than the DSSCs fabricated with commercial pastes. Moreover, DSSCs based on optimized photoelectrode with graphene/PANI counter electrode have shown 4.04% PCE, which is ~70% of the PCE that was achieved with Pt.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shahid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: