Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To the Editor: We appreciate the article from Bitar et al1 on ibrutinib-associated pityriasis rosea (PR)-like rash that allows us to share our experience and make some observations. Recently, we proposed criteria to distinguish PR from PR-like eruptions (Table I). In fact, distinguishing them is of paramount importance, as a typical PR may develop during but independently from a therapy.2,3 During PR, a self-limiting exanthematous disease associated with the endogenous systemic reactivation of human herpes virus (HHV)-6 and/or HHV-7, the drug (if indispensable for the health of the patient and except for immunosuppressive therapies that can favor viral reactivation) may be cautiously continued.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Drago et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: