Key result
Intensity-controlled exercise improves SBP and vascular regulation markers more than non-controlled training.
Why the study?
The effect of intensity-controlled versus non-intensity-controlled exercise programs on variables responsible for blood pressure regulation in hypertensive older adults was unclear.
Does an intensity-controlled exercise program improve variables responsible for blood pressure regulation compared to a non-intensity-controlled exercise program in hypertensive older adults?
Does an intensity-controlled exercise program improve variables responsible for blood pressure regulation compared to a non-intensity-controlled exercise program in hypertensive older adults?
A 12-week intensity-controlled exercise program is more effective than a non-intensity-controlled program at improving blood pressure and related biochemical and functional variables in hypertensive older adults.
May support intensity-controlled exercise for hypertension in older adults; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
To compare the effect of an intensity‐controlled exercise program (ICEP) and a nonintensity‐controlled exercise program (non‐ICEP) on the variables responsible for blood pressure regulation in hypertensive older adults. 95 hypertensive older adults (65.40 ± 7.48 years/22 males and 73 females) performed hemodynamic, functional fitness, and biochemical evaluations before and after 12 weeks of the multicomponent exercises which included walking, muscle strength, hydrogymnastics, Pilates, dynamic balance, agility, flexibility, and others. A significant improvement was observed in general functional fitness index (GFFI: p ≤ 0.000, d = 0.35), nitrite (NO2−: p ≤ 0.000, d = 0.49), systolic blood pressure (SBP: p ≤ 0.000, d = 0.65), diastolic blood pressure (DBP: p ≤ 0.013, d = 0.40), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS: p ≤ 0.007, d = 0.78), activity of the endothelial superoxide dismutase enzyme (ecSOD: p ≤ 0.032, d = 0.41), double product (DP: p ≤ 0.015, d = 0.43), and waist‐hip ratio (WHR: p ≤ 0.000, d = 0.44) for ICEP. Only GFFI (p ≤ 0.047, d = 0.12), TBARS (p ≤ 0.000, d = 0.77), SOD (p ≤ 0.025, d = 0.25), DP (p ≤ 0.046, d = 0.26), and BMI (p ≤ 0.018, d = 0.02) presented better results in non‐ICEP. When the effect of the groups (controlled by age, BMI, and sex) was evaluated, an increase was observed in the NO2−, TBARS, and SOD and a reduction in the SBP and WHR variables in the ICEP group compared to the non‐ICEP group. Twelve weeks of engagement in a controlled‐intensity exercise program was enough to improve the level of functional fitness and variables regarding blood pressure regulation in hypertensive older adults. Conversely, physical exercise performed without intensity control was related to the limited effect on such variables.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2024) studied Hypertension (n=95). Intensity-controlled exercise program (ICEP) vs. Nonintensity-controlled exercise program (non-ICEP) was evaluated on Variables responsible for blood pressure regulation (including SBP, DBP, NO2-, TBARS, ecSOD). A 12-week intensity-controlled exercise program significantly improved systolic blood pressure (p≤0.000, d=0.65) and other blood pressure regulation variables compared to a non-intensity-controlled program.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: