Key result
A 10-week athletic training program significantly improved Total FMS scores from 20.3 to 30.4 (p<0.0001) and eliminated sports-related injury risk in 90% of at-risk female high school athletes.
Why the study?
Does 10-weeks of athletic training improve PROMIS and FMS outcomes in female high school athletes?
Does 10-weeks of athletic training improve PROMIS and FMS outcomes in female high school athletes?
Absolute Event Rate: 30.4% vs 20.3%
p-value: p=<0.0001
A 10-week athletic training program in female high school athletes is feasible and significantly improves psychosocial wellness and physical performance measures.
Supports feasibility of athletic training in female high school athletes; hypothesis-generating for injury prevention and requires RCT confirmation.
Two major health concerns with female high school athletes are: 1) psychosocial wellness, and 2) sports-related injuries. It is also known that these health concerns are much greater for minority students who attend high school in economically depressed cities. While it has been well-established that exercise is an effective intervention for these health concerns, there are no established outcome measures to quantitatively assess athletic performance and injury prevention training interventions in this population. Previously, we have demonstrated the utility of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) as a robust outcome measure following ACL reconstruction. Functional Movement Screening (FMS) has been used as a tool to determine injury risk in female collegiate athletes. Since these tools are broadly available, we completed a research study of urban underrepresented minority and suburban female high school athletes, to assess the feasibility and utility of these tools to measure changes in this population during 10-weeks of athletic training. No adverse events of the training or study were reported. A Kaplan-Meier assessment of the data revealed that there was high student retention throughout the 10 weeks. In addition, we found no difference in weekly attendance between the students that completed the intervention vs. the dropouts (while they were in the program), indicating that the students were highly motivated to attend when possible. While no significant differences were found for fatigue and physical function, the intervention significantly improved anxiety, peer relationships, pain interference, and trended towards significance for depression (p<0.05). In terms of physical performance, bench press, combined Pro Agility, and total FMS were all significantly improved (p<0.05). Surprisingly, there were 10 students (67%) in peril of sports- related injury (FM˂14) at the start of the intervention, and all but 1 (90%) eliminated this serious risk factor. Collectively, these results demonstrate the feasibility of PROMIS and FMS outcomes to assess the efficacy of physical training interventions, in underrepresented minority female high school students, which warrants investigation in a formal prospective study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Calvin Lloyd Cole (2019) studied Psychosocial wellness and sports-related injury risk (n=30). Athletic performance and injury prevention training vs. Baseline was evaluated on Total FMS score (p=<0.0001). A 10-week athletic training program significantly improved Total FMS scores from 20.3 to 30.4 (p<0.0001) and eliminated sports-related injury risk in 90% of at-risk female high school athletes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: