Key result
Female secondary school athletes show lower Functional Movement Screen scores than males, suggesting greater injury risk.
Why the study?
Differences in functional movement screen scores between male and female secondary school athletes have been minimally studied despite implications for injury risk.
Are there sex differences in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores among healthy secondary school athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=60)
Are there sex differences in Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores among healthy secondary school athletes?
p-value: p=0.004
Female secondary school athletes score lower on the Functional Movement Screen compared to males, suggesting a potentially higher risk for injury due to deficits in mobility and core stabilization.
Female secondary school athletes may need sex-adjusted FMS interpretation for injury screening; leaves open whether thresholds improve risk prediction.
The functional movement screen (FMS) is commonly used to assess movement capacity and determine injury risk. Evidence suggests that athletes who score 14 points or less on the FMS are at increased risk for injury, but differences between males and females have been minimally studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate sex differences in FMS scores of secondary school athletes. Using a cross-sectional study design, 60 healthy secondary school athletes performed the FMS, which is composed of 7 functional movement tasks (deep squat, hurdle step, inline lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight-leg raise, trunk stability push-up, and rotary stability) and 3 clearance screens. Dependent variables were FMS total composite score and individual task scores; secondary analyses were performed using total research score and individual task research scores when indicated. Lower scores indicated functional movement deficits and increased injury risk. Healthy secondary school female athletes scored lower on the total composite (p = 0.004) than healthy secondary school male athletes. Females also scored lower on the following individual FMS tasks: inline lunge (p < 0.04) and trunk stability push-up (p = 0.001). Healthy secondary school female athletes scored 14 or less on the FMS total composite score and significantly lower in general compared with healthy secondary school male athletes, which suggests these female athletes may be at higher risk for injury. Factors that may contribute to increased injury risk include deficits in mobility, core stabilization, and coordinated movement patterns. Clinicians should be aware of possible sex differences when using the FMS and developing injury prevention programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy secondary school athletes (n=60). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on FMS total composite score (p=0.004). Female secondary school athletes scored significantly lower on the Functional Movement Screen total composite score compared with male athletes (p = 0.004), suggesting increased injury risk.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: