Key result
Female footballers had significantly lower Functional Movement Screen composite scores compared to male footballers (15.13 vs 17.03), and lower FMS scores were a significant predictor of match-related injuries.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare Functional Movement Screen composite scores between male and female footballers and evaluate its utility as an injury predictor tool.
Does the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) predict injury risk in male and female footballers?
Cohort (n=264)
Yes
Does the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) predict injury risk in male and female footballers?
Mean Difference: -1.9
Absolute Event Rate: 15.13% vs 17.03%
p-value: p=0.005
Female footballers score lower on the Functional Movement Screen than males, and a lower FMS score is a significant predictor of acute match-related injuries.
Suggests functional movement screening may help stratify injury risk in athletes; leaves open whether routine pre.
Functional Movement Screen evaluates seven key movement tasks crucial for smooth kinetic chain performance in sports. It assists sports therapists and coaches in identifying faulty patterns during preparticipation. Objectives: To compare FMS composite scores between male and female footballers and evaluate FMS as an injury predictor tool. Methods: Between March and June 2021, a cohort study was conducted on 264 footballers (132 males and 132 females) in Islamabad and Rawalpindi football academies. Players voluntarily underwent seven Functional Movement Screen tests. After participating in competitive or friendly matches, follow-ups were conducted to assess FMS composite scores and document any injuries sustained during the games. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0, and information on FMS scores and injuries was collected through FMS scoring sheets and a self-structured questionnaire. Results: There was statistically significant difference between male and female footballers composite scores of FMS (p<0.005). Female footballers (15.13 ± 2.32) scored less on mean score of FMS as compared to male footballers (17.03 ± 2.884). FMS was a good predictor of injury with 37.7 % variance on linear regression (p=0.005). Conclusions: Female footballers scored less composite score of FMS as compared to male footballers. FMS before participation can be a good predictor for detecting injuries in male and female footballers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amjad et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Injury risk in footballers (n=264). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite score (p=0.005). Female footballers had significantly lower Functional Movement Screen composite scores compared to male footballers (15.13 vs 17.03), and lower FMS scores were a significant predictor of match-related injuries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: