Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exact minimum Slater basis sets have yielded LCAO–MO–SCF wavefunctions for the model compounds ScH3NH3 and TiH3F. The dative bond in ScH3NH3 has a small overlap population (0.11 electron) and a small charge transfer of only 0.12 electron from N into, primarily, 4pz and 3dz2 of Sc, but there are comparable redistributions among the orbitals of e symmetry as well. The charge on F in TiH3F is − 0.28e, and the Ti–F bond has overlap populations of 0.20e in bonding orbitals of a symmetry, and 0.18e in those of e symmetry. Changes on each H atom (attached to the metal) are − 0.28e in ScH3NH3 and − 0.30e in TiH3F.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stevenson et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: