Key result
Practice variation in DOAC and incretin adoption narrows substantially over time with no prescribing correlation.
Why the study?
Insight into the uptake and practice variation of new medicines for common conditions in primary care, specifically DOACs and incretin-based therapies, was lacking.
What is the uptake and practice variation of DOACs and incretin-based therapies in primary care?
Observational (n=1,654,376)
Yes
What is the uptake and practice variation of DOACs and incretin-based therapies in primary care?
The adoption of DOACs and incretin-based therapies in primary care showed different profiles and large initial practice variation that decreased over time, with no clear correlation between early adopters of both classes.
High initial variation in DOAC and incretin adoption signals implementation gaps; leaves open drivers of differential uptake and equity.
AIMS: To gain insight in the uptake and practice variation in the prescription of 2 new medicine groups for common conditions in primary care (direct-acting oral anticoagulants [DOACs] and incretin-based therapies) from introduction, around 2007, to 2019 and the correlation between the adoption of those medicines in primary care. METHODS: Prescription data from general practices in the Dutch Nivel Primary Care Database from 2007 to 2019 were used. The percentage of patients with prescriptions for DOACs of all patients with prescriptions for DOACs and vitamin K antagonists was calculated per practice per year, as was the percentage of patients prescribed incretin-based therapies as a proportion of all patients with diabetes medication. Multilevel models were used to estimate practice variation for DOACs and incretin-based therapies, expressed as intraclass correlation coefficients. Linear regression analysis was used to study the association between the prescription of DOACs and incretin-based therapies. RESULTS: Per year, 46-424 general practices and 179 933-1 654 376 patients were included. In 2019, the mean percentage of patients per practice using DOACs or incretin-based therapies was 54.9 and 9.7%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient decreased from 0.75 to 0.024 for DOACs and from 0.33 to 0.074 for incretin-based medicines during the study period. No clear correlation was found between the prescription of DOACs and incretin-based therapies. CONCLUSION: DOACs and incretin-based therapies have different adoption profiles and practice variation is large, especially in the years before these medicines were introduced in guidelines. Early adopters of both medicine classes differ.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dankers et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients requiring anticoagulation or diabetes medication (n=1,654,376). DOACs and incretin-based therapies vs. Vitamin K antagonists and other diabetes medications was evaluated on Practice variation (intraclass correlation coefficients) and correlation between the prescription of DOACs and incretin-based therapies. The adoption of DOACs and incretin-based therapies showed large practice variation that decreased over time (ICC from 0.75 to 0.024 for DOACs), with no clear correlation between their prescriptions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: