Key result
Moderate-intensity static magnetic fields enhance endothelial arteriogenesis in vitro, augmenting VEGF-A-driven tubule formation.
Why the study?
The effects of a moderate-intensity static magnetic field on early-stage endothelial capillary tubule formation and its interaction with VEGF-A stimulation were not well understood.
Moderate-intensity static magnetic fields may synergistically enhance VEGF-A-stimulated arteriogenesis in vitro.
In vitro arteriogenesis promotion by static magnetic fields is hypothesis-generating; in vivo studies required before any clinical consideration.
Effects of a moderate-intensity static magnetic field (SMF) on the early-stage development of endothelial capillary tubule formation were examined during the initial cell growth periods using co-cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human diploid fibroblasts. The co-cultured cells within a well (16 mm in diameter) were exposed to SMF intensity up to 120 mT (Bmax) with the maximum spatial gradient of 21 mT/mm using a disc-shaped permanent magnet (16 mm in diameter and 2.5 mm in height) for up to 10 days. Control exposure was performed without magnet. Some vascular endothelial cells were treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A (10 ng/ml) to promote the tubule formation every 2-3 days. Four experimental protocols were performed: (1) non-exposure (control); (2) SMF exposure alone; (3) non-exposure with VEGF-A; (4) SMF exposure with VEGF-A. Photomicrographs of tubule cells immunostained with an anti-platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1 [CD31[) antibody as a pan-endothelial marker, were analyzed after culture at 37 degrees C for 4, 7, and 10 days. The mean values of the area density and the length of tubules (related mainly to arteriogenesis) as well as the number of bifurcations (related mainly to angiogenesis) were determined as parameters of tubule formation and were compared between the groups. After a 10 day incubation, in the peripheral part of the culture wells, SMF alone significantly promoted the tubule formation in terms of the area density and the length of tubules, compared with control group. In the central part of the wells, however, SMF did not cause any significant changes in the parameters of tubule formation. After a 7 day incubation, VEGF-A significantly promoted all the parameters of tubule formation in any part of the wells, compared with control group. With regard to the synergistic effects of SMF and VEGF-A on tubule formation, after a 10 day incubation, SMF significantly promoted the VEGF-A-increased area density and length of tubules in the peripheral part of the wells, compared with the VEGF-A treatment alone. However, SMF did not induce any significant changes in the VEGF-A-increased number of bifurcations in any part of the wells. The tubule cells observed in the wells had elongated, spindle-like shapes, and the direction of cell elongation was random, irrespective of the presence and direction of SMF. These findings suggest that the application of SMF to intact or VEGF-A-stimulated vascular endothelial cells leads mainly to promote or enhance arteriogenesis in the peripheral part of the wells, where the spatial gradient increases relative to the central part. The effects of SMF on the VEGF-A-enhanced tubule formation appear to be synergistic or additive in arteriogenesis but not in angiogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okano et al. (2006) studied Endothelial capillary tubule formation (in vitro). Moderate-intensity static magnetic field (SMF) vs. Non-exposure (control without magnet) was evaluated on Area density, length of tubules, and number of bifurcations. Application of a moderate-intensity static magnetic field to intact or VEGF-A-stimulated vascular endothelial cells significantly promoted arteriogenesis in the peripheral part of the wells.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: