Digital businesses are often described as placeless, borderless, and infinitely scalable. In practice, digital strategy depends on infrastructures, suppliers, data flows, talent pools, innovation ecosystems, and legal regimes located somewhere and controlled by someone. This article develops organizational geographic intelligence as the capability to sense, interpret, and act on the location, concentration, connectivity, governance, and vulnerability of critical dependencies. Drawing on digital sovereignty and economic geography, it introduces SCALE—Stack, Clusters, Access, Law, and Exposure—as a practical diagnostic architecture. The framework draws on 14 semistructured interviews and a cross-functional workshop at an anonymized Northern European agricultural-equipment manufacturer. The current item ratings and target dimension profile reported in the article are actual workshop outputs. SCALE helps managers map physical and digital dependencies, reveal geographic asymmetries in value and control, surface cross-functional disagreement, and identify options in cloud architecture, procurement, data governance, continuity planning, and ecosystem strategy. The scorecard is a structured workshop heuristic, not an externally validated maturity scale. Its purpose is stronger visibility, reversibility, continuity, and strategic control—not universal localization or self-sufficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonny Holmström (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: