Key result
The Gotland Male Depression Scale identified no additional cases of depression compared to the Beck Depression Inventory among men in primary care, with a correlation of 0.80 between the scales.
Why the study?
Does the Gotland Male Depression Scale improve the detection of depression compared to the Beck Depression Inventory in men visiting a primary care clinic?
Cross-Sectional (n=223)
No
Does the Gotland Male Depression Scale improve the detection of depression compared to the Beck Depression Inventory in men visiting a primary care clinic?
The Gotland Male Depression Scale did not identify additional cases of depression compared to the Beck Depression Inventory in men in primary care, though targeted screening yielded a higher proportion of depressed men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Targeted screening may aid depression detection in men with high alcohol use; leaves open whether GS adds value over BDI in primary care.
BACKGROUND: Anger attacks and alcohol use may mask depressive symptoms in men. Only the Gotland Male Depression Scale (GS) includes such items. AIMS: To study the usefulness of the GS and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) in detecting depression among men in primary care. METHODS: At a family doctor's drop-in clinic in Stockholm, Sweden, all men were invited into the study 2 days a week (opportunistic screening). On other days, the men who mentioned mental symptoms were invited (targeted screening). The men filled in BDI, GS and a social questionnaire. The doctor invited the men with BDI > or = 10 and /or GS > or = 13 to a repeat visit. The outcome was depression diagnosed according to DSM-IV and the severity was assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. RESULTS: 223 men were recruited, 190 by opportunistic and 33 by targeted screening. Seventeen per cent of the men reported an alcohol consumption that might put them at risk. In the opportunistic screening, 23% scored BDI > or = 10 and 14% scored GS > or = 13. The prevalence of depression in the opportunistic screening was 10.5%. The proportion of depressed men in the targeted screening was 60.6%. In total, 40 men were depressed, 63% had a mild and 35% moderate depression. The correlation between the scales was 0.80. The GS identified no additional cases. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical depression was quite common among those men who often had a high alcohol consumption, indicating an advantage for the GS when screening for depression among men. In primary care, a targeted screening procedure seems to be the most feasible method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Strömberg et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=223). Gotland Male Depression Scale (GS) vs. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was evaluated on Depression diagnosed according to DSM-IV (correlation 0.80). The Gotland Male Depression Scale identified no additional cases of depression compared to the Beck Depression Inventory among men in primary care, with a correlation of 0.80 between the scales.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: