In high-volume electronics assembly, rework destabilizes delivery performance, lowers productivity, and raises the cost of subpar quality. This research details an organized Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) improvement initiative that was carried out in a high-volume manufacturing facility on mobile phone assembly lines. Dominant rework drivers were identified using Pareto analysis based on a month's worth of rework records. They were then verified by cross-functional review, shop floor observation, and a cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagram. Interventions concentrated on two areas: (i) workstation-level standardization and training to lower failures linked to handling and soldering, and (ii) crucial component quality governance (supplier containment and tightened incoming quality control for LCD, keypad, and PCBA-related issues). Rework decreased from 20188 to 10 976 units (−45.63%) during the next month, according to a before-and-after analysis. Results are presented as normalized rework rates (per 1000 units produced), which is a 25.81% reduction, to improve comparability and internal validity. When production exposure data are available, simple statistical tests and/or control-chart evidence are used to corroborate the findings. For high-volume assembly environments, the example offers transferable advice on defect prioritization, intervention traceability, and sustainment methods (control plan, KPI monitoring, and audit routines).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdullah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: