Key result
Dual ET(A)/ET(B) blockade improves endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in insulin-resistant patients.
Why the study?
Insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased endothelin-1 production, but the effect of endothelin receptor blockade on vasodilatation in this population is unclear.
Does dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in individuals with insulin resistance?
Does dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade improve endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in individuals with insulin resistance?
p-value: p=< 0.01
Dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade enhances endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in subjects with insulin resistance, highlighting the role of ET-1 in endothelial dysfunction in this population.
Endothelial benefits of dual ET blockade in insulin resistance warrant prospective trials; does not yet support clinical use.
Insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased production of the pro-inflammatory vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 (ET-1). The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that blockade of ET receptors results in enhanced endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (EDV) in individuals with insulin resistance. Twelve individuals with insulin resistance without any history of diabetes or cardiovascular disease and 8 age-matched controls with high insulin sensitivity, as determined by hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, were investigated on 2 separate occasions using forearm venous occlusion plethysmography. Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilatation was determined before and after selective ET(A) and dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade. A 60 minute intraarterial infusion of the ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ123 (10 nmol/min) combined with the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ788 (5 nmol/min) evoked a significant increase in acetylcholine-mediated EDV (P < 0.01) in individuals with insulin resistance. The endothelium-independent vasodilator response to nitroprusside was not changed by dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade. Dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade did not affect the response to acetylcholine or nitroprusside in the insulin-sensitive group. Selective ET(A) receptor blockade did not evoke any changes in endothelium-dependent or endothelium-independent vasodilatation in either group. This study demonstrates that dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade, but not selective ET(A) blockade, enhances EDV in subjects with insulin resistance, suggesting that ET-1 is involved in the regulation of endothelial function in individuals with insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shemyakin et al. (2006) studied Insulin resistance (n=20). Dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade (BQ123 and BQ788) vs. Selective ET(A) receptor blockade and baseline was evaluated on Acetylcholine-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation (EDV) (p=< 0.01). Dual ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade significantly increased acetylcholine-mediated endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in individuals with insulin resistance (P < 0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: