Key result
Only 59% of Canadian healthcare education programs include women-specific CVD content in curricula.
Why the study?
Formal education on sex- and gender-specific cardiovascular disease risk factors, symptoms, treatment, and outcomes is lacking in healthcare training programs.
Cross-Sectional (n=80)
Yes
There are substantial gaps in women-specific cardiovascular disease training across healthcare education programs, highlighting a need for curriculum integration to minimize gaps in care.
Persistent gaps in women-specific CVD education warrant curriculum review; leaves open effective implementation approaches in training programs.
Despite its importance, formal education in healthcare training programs on sex- and gender-specific cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, symptoms, treatment, and outcomes is lacking. We completed rapid reviews of the academic and grey literature to describe the current state of women-specific CVD education in medical, nursing, and other healthcare education programs. Second, we analyzed results from a Canada-wide survey of healthcare professional education programs to identify gaps in curricula related to sex- and gender-specific training in CVD. Our academic review yielded only 15 peer-reviewed publications, and our online search only 20 healthcare education programs, that note that they specifically address women, or sex and gender, and CVD in their curricula. Across both searches, the majority of training and education programs were from the USA, varied greatly in length, delivery mode, and content covered, and lacked consistency in evaluation. Of surveys sent to 213 Canadian universities and other entry-to-practice programs, 80 complete responses (37.6%) were received. A total of 47 respondents (59%) reported that their programs included women-specific CVD content. Among those programs without content specific to CVD in women, 69.0% stated that its inclusion would add "quite a bit" or "a great deal" of value to the program. This study highlights the emerging focus on and substantial gaps in women-specific CVD training and education across healthcare education programs. All medical, nursing, and healthcare training programs are implored to incorporate sex- and gender-based CVD content into their regular curricula as part of a consolidated effort to minimize gaps in cardiovascular care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mackay et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease education (n=80). Women-specific cardiovascular disease education was evaluated on Inclusion of women-specific CVD content. Women-specific cardiovascular disease content was included in only 59% of responding Canadian healthcare education programs, highlighting substantial gaps in current training curricula.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from CJC Open