Key result
Radiofrequency PVI causes direct tissue inexcitability in ~73% of pulmonary veins.
Why the study?
Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation results in inexcitability of many pulmonary veins, but the underlying electrophysiological mechanism is unknown.
Does radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation alter the electrophysiology (capture threshold, ERP, excitability) of pulmonary vein sleeves in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=67)
Does radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation alter the electrophysiology (capture threshold, ERP, excitability) of pulmonary vein sleeves in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Antral PVI causes inexcitability in most PVs due to resting membrane potential depolarization, and adenosine can reveal transient re-excitability to help ensure true isolation.
PVI-induced PV inexcitability may confound isolation assessment; supports adenosine testing to confirm true block and extends mechanistic understanding of antral ablation.
PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation has been shown to result in inexcitability of a large fraction of pulmonary veins (PVs), but the mechanism is unknown. We investigated the mechanism of PV inexcitability by assessing the effects of PVI on the electrophysiology of PV sleeves. METHODS: Patients undergoing first-time radiofrequency PVI were studied. Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability were measured in PVs and the left atrial appendage (LAA) before and after ablation. Adenosine was used to assess both transient reconnection and transient venous re-excitability. RESULTS: We assessed 248 veins among 67 patients. Mean PV ERP (249.7 ± 54.0 ms) and capture threshold (1.4 ± 1.6 mA) increased to 300.5 ± 67.1 and 5.7 ± 5.6 mA, respectively (P < .0001 for both) in the 26.9% PVs that remained excitable, but no change was noted in either measure in the LAA. In 16.3% of the 73.1% inexcitable veins, transient PV re-excitability (as opposed to reconnection) was seen with adenosine administration. CONCLUSIONS: Antral PVI causes inexcitability in a majority of the PVs, which can transiently be restored in some with adenosine. Among PVs that remain excitable, ERP and capture threshold increase significantly. These data imply resting membrane potential depolarization of the of PV myocardial sleeves. As PV inexcitability hampers the assessment of entrance and exit block, demonstrating transient PV re-excitability during adenosine administration helps ensure true isolation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saluja et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=67). Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation vs. Before ablation (baseline) was evaluated on Capture threshold, effective refractory period (ERP), and excitability (p=<.0001). Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation caused inexcitability in 73.1% of veins, and significantly increased effective refractory period and capture threshold in remaining excitable veins (P<.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: