Key result
Ablating residual potentials after PVI cuts acute PV reconnection ~65% versus no further ablation.
Why the study?
Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is frequently encountered after PVI for atrial fibrillation, and it was unknown whether ablating residual potentials reduces this acute reconnection.
Does additional ablation of residual potentials reduce acute pulmonary vein reconnection in patients undergoing PVI for atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=160)
Randomized
Does additional ablation of residual potentials reduce acute pulmonary vein reconnection in patients undergoing PVI for atrial fibrillation?
Ablation of residual potentials after initial pulmonary vein isolation significantly reduces acute PV reconnection rates.
Supports additional ablation of residual potentials to enhance PVI durability; extends randomized evidence for optimizing AF ablation techniques.
INTRODUCTION: Acute pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection is frequently encountered in patients undergoing PV isolation (PVI) procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. In this study, we investigated whether the identification and ablation of residual potentials (RPs), after the initial achievement of PVI, reduces acute PV reconnection rate. METHODS: Following PVI in 160 patients, mapping along the ablation line was performed to identify RPs, defined as bipolar amplitude ≥0.2 mV or 0.1-0.19 mV combined with a negative component of the unipolar electrogram. Ipsilateral PV sets with RPs were randomized to either no further ablation (Group B) or to additional ablation of the identified RPs (Group C). The primary study endpoint was spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection after a 30-min waiting period and was also evaluated in ipsilateral PV sets without RPs (Group A). RESULTS: After isolation of 287 PV pairs, 135 had no RPs (Group A), whereas the remaining PV pairs were randomized to either Group B (n = 75) or Group C (n = 77). Ablation of RPs resulted in a reduction of spontaneous or adenosine-mediated PV reconnection rate (16.9% in Group C vs 48.0% in Group B; p < 0.001). Group A was associated with a significantly lower percentage of acute PV reconnection as compared to Group B (5.9% vs 48.0%; p < 0.001) and Group C (5.9% vs 16.9%; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: After PVI achievement, the absence of RPs along the circumferential line is associated with a low likelihood of acute PV reconnection rate. Ablation of RPs significantly reduces spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tzeis et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=160). Additional ablation of residual potentials vs. No further ablation was evaluated on Spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection after a 30-min waiting period (p=<0.001). Ablation of residual potentials after pulmonary vein isolation significantly reduced spontaneous or adenosine-mediated acute PV reconnection compared to no further ablation (16.9% vs 48.0%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: