Key result
PVI with additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection unmasked by adenosine and a 1-hour waiting time resulted in higher 1-year AF freedom compared to PVI alone.
Why the study?
Does additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection unmasked by adenosine and waiting time improve 1-year AF freedom compared to PVI alone in patients undergoing PVAC ablation?
Cohort (n=80)
Does additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection unmasked by adenosine and waiting time improve 1-year AF freedom compared to PVI alone in patients undergoing PVAC ablation?
Additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection unmasked by adenosine and waiting time improves 1-year AF freedom after PVAC ablation, particularly when initial isolation involves high-temperature/low-power applications.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support adenosine testing plus waiting time in PVAC ablation; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the impact of radiofrequency (RF) characteristics on acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVR) and outcome after PVAC ablation. PVI with additional ablation of PVR (PVI + PVR) was compared to PVI-only. METHODS: In 40 consecutive patients, after PVAC-guided PVI, adenosine and a 1-hour waiting time were used to unmask and ablate acute PVR (PVI + PVR group). RF-characteristics and 1-year AF freedom were compared post hoc to 40 clinically matched patients undergoing PVI only (PVI-only group). Custom-made software was used to assess RF characteristics of the PVAC applications needed to obtain baseline PVI. RESULTS: There was no difference in clinical characteristics or baseline RF-profile between both groups. Acute PVR was observed and ablated in 38 of 160 veins (24%). AF-freedom after PVI + PVR was higher than PVI (85% vs 65%, P < 0.05). Within the PVI group, comparing patients with and without AF-recurrence, the percentage of PVAC applications with high T° (>48°) but low power (<3W) was higher (28 ± 18% vs 11 ± 11%, P < 0.0001). Within the PVI + PVR group, when comparing PVs with and without PVR, the percentage of low power/high T° PVAC applications was also higher (27 ± 13% vs 13 ± 15%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: (1) After PVAC ablation, 24% of PVs exhibit acute reconnection. Additional ablation of reconnection improves clinical outcome. (2) Acute reconnection as well as clinical recurrence of AF are characterized by PVAC ablation with a considerable number of applications with high temperature but low power. (3) If PV isolation is obtained with low power applications, a consistent use of both adenosine and waiting time is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Greef et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Atrial Fibrillation (n=80). PVI with additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection (PVI + PVR) vs. PVI-only was evaluated on 1-year AF freedom (p=<0.05). PVI with additional ablation of acute pulmonary vein reconnection unmasked by adenosine and a 1-hour waiting time resulted in higher 1-year AF freedom compared to PVI alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: