Key result
Acute PE carries ~18% inhospital mortality, with risk driven by RV failure and systemic organ dysfunction.
Why the study?
Assessment of commonly available demographic, clinical, and investigational parameters for prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism may simplify triage compared to conventional complicated indices.
Observational (n=200)
No
Routine clinical and investigational parameters, such as hypoxemia and signs of right ventricular failure, can effectively risk-stratify patients with acute pulmonary embolism for inhospital adverse outcomes.
May support simpler PE triage; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
The assessment of commonly available demographic, clinical, and easily calculable investigational parameters instead of the conventional complicated indices for prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism may help in triage in a simple and cost-effective way. Clinical, demographic, and investigational parameters were collected and utilized for the assessment of inhospital prognosis of acute pulmonary embolism in 200 consecutive patients admitted to our institute. Overall mortality was 18% and poor outcome at discharge was seen in another 18.5%. In univariate analysis, predominant presenting symptom of fatigue, sudden onset of symptoms, overt right ventricular failure, hypoxemia at admission, low SBP and DBP, coexistent pulmonary or cardiac illness, ECG evidence of right axis deviation, SIQ3T3 pattern, conduction blocks, echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular dysfunction, decreased inspiratory collapse of inferior vena cava, severe pulmonary arterial hypertension, visible thrombus in pulmonary artery, significant tricuspid regurgitation, computed tomographic evidence of total occlusion of major pulmonary arteries, diameter of main pulmonary artery, acute or chronic pulmonary embolism, renal and hepatic dysfunction, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, troponin elevation, use of fibrin-specific agent, requirement of inotropic support, and mechanical ventilation were the variables found to significantly predict adverse outcome. In multivariate analysis, hypoxemia, no improvement after lysis, deranged liver function test, conduction blocks, and signs of right ventricular failure were the significant variables, while inotropic support requirement had a trend toward significance. Clinical, demographic, and routine investigational parameters help to risk-stratify the patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism and to prognosticate and manage in a simpler yet effective way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2014) conducted an observational in acute pulmonary embolism (n=200). Clinical, demographic, and investigational parameters (e.g., hypoxemia, right ventricular failure) was evaluated on Inhospital mortality and poor outcome at discharge. In acute pulmonary embolism, overall inhospital mortality was 18%, with hypoxemia, deranged liver function, conduction blocks, and right ventricular failure significantly predicting adverse outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: