Key result
Continued growth hormone therapy in adolescent patients with GH deficiency after final height requires individualized decision-making, with achievement of satisfactory bone mass as a major determinant.
Why the study?
Does continued growth hormone therapy improve somatic development and bone mass in adolescent patients with growth hormone deficiency after final height?
Does continued growth hormone therapy improve somatic development and bone mass in adolescent patients with growth hormone deficiency after final height?
The decision to continue growth hormone therapy in adolescents with GHD after final height should be individualized, with achievement of satisfactory bone mass being a major determinant.
This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
While the benefits of growth hormone (GH) therapy in adult hypopituitary patients with GH deficiency (GHD) are established, the role of continued GH therapy after final height in adolescent GH-deficient patients remains unclear. Preliminary data suggest that cessation of GH on completion of linear growth may be associated with impairment of somatic development and adverse changes in body composition. For the present time, the decision whether to continue GH treatment in adolescent patients with GHD is best made on an individual basis. For such patients, continuity of care is crucial. Children and adults with GHD are usually managed by physicians in separate departments, who may focus on different aspects of treatment and care. Close collaboration between paediatric and adult physicians is essential to ensure smooth transition and to minimize the drop-out rate from follow-up. Given the previous period of treatment during childhood, paediatric physicians should be best placed to discuss the potential benefits of continuing GH therapy and instigate retesting of GH secretion. Many children with isolated idiopathic GHD will produce normal GH responses if retested at adult height. Patients with multiple pituitary hormone deficits are more likely to have ongoing GHD, as are patients who have received CNS irradiation. Quality of life does not appear to be decreased in adolescents with GHD who stop treatment, so achievement of satisfactory bone mass is a major determinant of the decision whether to continue therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continued GH after final height in adolescent GHD warrants individualized decisions; leaves open the need for prospective trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savage et al. (2004) conducted a review in Growth hormone deficiency. Growth hormone therapy vs. Cessation of therapy was evaluated. Continued growth hormone therapy in adolescent patients with GH deficiency after final height requires individualized decision-making, with achievement of satisfactory bone mass as a major determinant.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: