Key result
Continuing anticoagulation during CIED implant is linked to higher bleeding, driven by vitamin K antagonists.
Why the study?
The postoperative bleeding risk of patients continuing anticoagulation therapy during implant surgery and bone grafting procedures was unclear.
Does continuing anticoagulation therapy increase postoperative bleeding risk in patients undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting?
Observational (n=564)
Does continuing anticoagulation therapy increase postoperative bleeding risk in patients undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 0.6%
Continuing anticoagulation therapy during implant surgery is safe and avoids thromboembolic complications, though Vitamin-K inhibitors carry a slightly higher, manageable bleeding risk.
Supports continuing AT in implant surgery with local hemostasis; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm safety across AT subtypes.
OBJECTIVES: This prospective clinical comparative study aimed to analyze the postoperative bleeding risk of patients continuing their anticoagulation therapy (AT) and undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The treatments ranged from the insertion of single or multiple dental implants over implant exposures to sinus floor augmentation and vertical and/or lateral bone grafting with autologous bone grafts. The patients of the test groups (AT groups) were treated with platelet aggregation inhibitors (PAIs), Vitamin-K inhibitors, Vitamin-K inhibitor withdrawal bridged with heparin (LMWH), or new/direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs/DOACs). Patients of the control group were non-anticoagulated (non-AT group). Surgical procedures were performed in the same manner in all groups. Pre, intra, and postoperative data concerning the treatment, extent of the surgery and bleedings was recorded and statistically evaluated. RESULTS: There were seven postoperative bleedings in 564 patients (1.2%), four in the AT groups (3.4%), and three in the non-AT group (0.6%). No thromboembolic complication occurred in the whole observation period. The invasiveness of the surgical procedure had no statistically significant effect on bleeding frequencies. Patients taking Vitamin-K inhibitors had a significantly higher risk of a postoperative bleeding compared to patients without any AT (P = 0.038). Two patients were hospitalized due to the severity of the bleeding as a precautionary measure (one in the non-AT and one in the PAI group). All bleedings were easily controllable with local hemostatic measures. There was no postoperative bleeding recorded for patients taking DOACs. CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation therapy should be continued in patients undergoing implant surgery and bone grafting procedures avoiding thromboembolic complications. Surgeons should always apply the most minimally invasive approach to reduce postoperative risks and be able to apply local hemostatic measures in terms of a bleeding complication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clemm et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Implant surgery and bone grafting procedures (n=564). Anticoagulation therapy vs. Non-anticoagulated was evaluated on Postoperative bleeding. Continuing anticoagulation therapy during implant surgery resulted in a 3.4% postoperative bleeding rate versus 0.6% in controls, with significantly higher risk for Vitamin-K inhibitors (P=0.038).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: