Key result
Continuing antithrombotic therapy safely permits invasive dental procedures when paired with local hemostasis.
Why the study?
The dental management of patients on anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs poses challenges due to bleeding risks and requires optimized protocols.
Does suspending anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs prior to invasive dental treatment reduce bleeding complications compared to continuing therapy?
Does suspending anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs prior to invasive dental treatment reduce bleeding complications compared to continuing therapy?
In patients on antithrombotic therapy undergoing dental procedures, medications should generally not be suspended, as local hemostatic measures are sufficient to control bleeding.
Supports continuing antithrombotic therapy for dental procedures with local measures; extends RCT data favoring uninterrupted regimens to reduce thromboembolic events.
INTRODUCTION: Adequate hemostasis is crucial for the success of invasive dental treatment, since bleeding problems can give rise to complications associated with important morbidity-mortality. The dental treatment of patients who tend to an increased risk of bleeding due to the use of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet drugs raises a challenge in the daily practice of dental professionals. Adequate knowledge of the mechanisms underlying hemostasis, and the optimized management of such patients, are therefore very important issues. OBJECTIVES: A study is made of the anticoagulant / antiplatelet drugs currently available on the market, with evaluation of the risks and benefits of suspending such drugs prior to invasive dental treatment. In addition, a review is made of the current management protocols used in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A literature search was made in the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases, covering all studies published in the last 5 years in English and Spanish. Studies conducted in humans and with scientific evidence levels 1 and 2 (metaanalyses, systematic reviews, randomized phase 1 and 2 trials, cohort studies and case-control studies) were considered. The keywords used for the search were: tooth extraction, oral surgery, hemostasis, platelet aggregation inhibitors, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, warfarin, acenocoumarol. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Many management protocols have been developed, though in all cases a full clinical history is required, together with complementary hemostatic tests to minimize any risks derived from dental treatment. Many authors consider that patient medication indicated for the treatment of background disease should not be altered or suspended unless so indicated by the prescribing physician. Local hemostatic measures have been shown to suffice for controlling possible bleeding problems resulting from dental treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mingarro-de-Leon et al. (2014) conducted a review in Patients receiving anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment requiring dental treatment. Continuation of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet treatment vs. Suspension or alteration of treatment was evaluated on Bleeding complications. Continuation of anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet medication prior to invasive dental treatment is recommended, as local hemostatic measures are sufficient to control possible bleeding.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: