The copper precursors bis-hexafluoroacetylacetonato-copper vinyl-trimethyl-silane-copper(I)-hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac)Cu(VTMS), 2-methyl-1-hexen-3-yne-copper-hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac)Cu(MHY), and dimethylbutene-copper(I)-hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac)Cu(DMB) are compared with respect to deposition rates and metal content obtained by focused electron beam induced deposition. Exposure was performed with 25 keV electrons in a Cambridge S100 scanning electron microscope equipped with a lithography system. Tip deposition rates increase with increasing precursor vapor pressure and range between 47 nm/s for (hfac)Cu(DMB) to about 4 nm/s for A decay of deposition rates with time, i.e. , tip length, is observed. Electric 4-point measurements indicate an insulating behavior of deposited lines for all precursors. In contrast, Cu contents of up to 45-60 atom % were found by Auger electron spectroscopy in thin rectangular deposits using (hfac)Cu(DMB) and (hfac)Cu(VTMS) as precursors. A discussion in terms of monolayer coverage, completeness of precursor molecule dissociation, and precursor stability is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luisier et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: