Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To compare a human fibroblast-derived dermal substitute (HFDS) to a viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM) for use in diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Methods: An electronic medical record database of 1622 refractory DFUs with areas 1–40 cm 2 was analyzed. Results: Cox estimates of wound closure for HFDS (1444 wounds) were significantly greater (p = 0.0002) by weeks 12 (31 vs 21%), 24 (55 vs 39%) and 36 (68 vs 51%) compared with vCPM (178 wounds). HFDS reduced the median time to wound closure by 55% compared with vCPM, (20 vs 36 weeks, p = 0.0002). HFDS also increased the probability of wound closure by 60% (hazard ratio = 1.60 [95% confidence interval, (1.25, 2.06)], p = 0.0002). Conclusion: HFDS improved time and frequency of wound closure in DFUs versus vCPM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabolinski et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: