Key result
Recombinant CHO cells expressing the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor support persistent, non-lytic rhesus enteric calicivirus infection, continuously releasing infectious virus for at least 12 passages.
Recombinant CHO cells expressing CAR can serve as a valuable producer cell line and model for investigating non-lytic viral exit mechanisms of enteric caliciviruses.
Offers stable CHO-CAR cell line for calicivirus propagation; leaves open relevance to human enteric disease or clinical translation.
Recently, using a panel of recombinant CHO cell lines, we identified the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) and histo-blood group antigens (HBGAs) or sialic acid as the minimum requirement for susceptibility to rhesus enteric calicivirus (ReCV) infections. While ReCVs cause lytic infection in LLC-MK2 cells, recombinant CHO (rCHO) cell lines did not exhibit any morphological changes upon infection. To monitor infectious virus production, rCHO cell cultures had to be freeze-thawed and titrated on LLC-MK2 monolayers. This raised the question of whether ReCV infection in rCHO cells is persistent and whether non-enveloped progeny virions are released from the infected cells. Here, we used the rCHO-CAR+ cell line and a CAR and sialic acid-dependent recovirus strain (FT7) and found that these cells were persistently infected, and infectious virus was continuously produced and released into the culture without showing any visible cell damage. Viral capsid protein and replication intermediate double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) were detectable in almost all cells for at least 12 passages. We suspect a fully exosomal viral exit mechanism without a lytic cycle in these cells. rCHO cell may provide a valuable system for ReCV production (producer cell line) and serve as a model for investigating enteric calicivirus non-lytic viral exit mechanisms and the properties of the released, most likely membrane-cloaked, infectious progeny virions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farkas et al. (2024) studied Rhesus enteric calicivirus infection. Rhesus enteric calicivirus (ReCV-FT7) infection vs. Mock infection was evaluated on Infectious virus production and cell viability. Recombinant CHO cells expressing the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor support persistent, non-lytic rhesus enteric calicivirus infection, continuously releasing infectious virus for at least 12 passages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: