This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We examine how the gestalt of corporate reputation, defined as the dispersion of strengths and weaknesses across reputational dimensions, affects shareholder value. While prior research takes an aggregated view, we contrast two gestalts: a balanced one with consistently high ratings across dimensions (Anna Karenina principle) and an imbalanced one with exceptional ratings in some areas but lower in others (Great Gatsby principle). Our stock portfolio analysis suggests that firms following the Great Gatsby principle outperform, while no evidence supports the Anna Karenina principle. Additional analysis underscores the importance of organizational culture in driving performance. The findings show that exceptional strength in some dimensions can offset weaknesses in others. Our study guides firms in allocating resources across reputational dimensions and informs fund managers on stock selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matzinger et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: