Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It has been suggested that pertussis toxin is a virulence factor of Bordetella pertussis. Although extracts enriched in pertussis toxin activity have been reported to enhance immune responsiveness, other studies have demonstrated a suppressive ability, suggesting that the toxin may contribute to the virulence of B. pertussis through mechanisms involving immune suppression. We report that purified pertussis toxin suppressed the in vitro immunoglobulin M antibody response of mouse splenocytes to sheep erythrocytes. At submitogenic doses, the toxin also suppressed [3H]thymidine incorporation by splenocytes, suggesting that it interfered with antibody formation by inhibiting lymphocyte proliferation. Antiviral activity was detected in culture supernatants obtained from pertussis toxin-suppressed splenocyte cultures by using a cytopathic effect inhibition assay. This antiviral activity was virus nonspecific, sensitive to pH 2.0 treatment, stable to heating at 56 degrees C, and neutralized by anti-gamma interferon antiserum. Finally, the fractionation of splenocytes by anti-immunoglobulin panning techniques suggested that Lyt2+ lymphocytes proliferated in response to pertussis toxin and produced interferon. Our results suggest that pertussis toxin may contribute to the virulence of B. pertussis through stimulation of Lyt2+ lymphocytes, resulting in the induction of gamma interferon and the subsequent inhibition of the primary antibody response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vogel et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: