Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Re-188-RC-160, a radiolabeled somatostatin analogue, is being explored for its potential as a local/regionally administered radiotherapeutic agent targeting somatostatin receptor-positive tumors. In studies in vitro and in vivo, Re-188-RC-160 was found to bind to somatostatin receptor-positive cells (NCI-H69, human small cell lung carcinoma), but not to binding-negative cells (Raji, Burkitt's lymphoma). The comparative binding of Re-188-labeled RC-160 [cyclic NH2-(D)-Phe-Cys-Try-(D)-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys-Trp-NH2] or CTOP [cyclic NH2-(D)-Phe-Cys-Try-(D)-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-ol], a mu-opioid receptor antagonist used a negative control compound, was also determined in vitro and in vivo using NCI-H69 cells as targets. Re-188-RC-160 demonstrated higher net binding in vitro and in vivo compared to Re-188-RC-CTOP, and in vitro its binding could be reduced by excess unlabeled RC-160 whereas binding of Re-188-CTOP could not be reduced. Using another somatostatin receptor-positive human tumor line, ZR-75-1, a substantial amount of the cell-bound Re-188-RC-160 was found to be internalized. Does estimates for Re-188-RC-160 in animals containing NCI-H69 tumors indicated that with three serial injections therapeutic doses greater than 60 Gy can be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zamora et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: