Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Over the past decade, invention and adoption of novel multiplexing technologies for tissues have made increasing impacts in basic and translational research and, to a lesser degree, clinical medicine. Platforms capable of highly multiplexed immunohistochemistry or in situ RNA measurements promise evaluation of protein or RNA targets at levels of plex and sensitivity logs above traditional methods - all with preservation of spatial context. These methods promise objective biomarker quantification, markedly increased sensitivity, and single-cell resolution. Increasingly, development of novel technologies is enabling multi-omic interrogations with spatial correlation of RNA and protein expression profiles in the same sample. Such sophisticated methods will provide unprecedented insights into tissue biology, biomarker science, and, ultimately, patient health. However, this sophistication comes at significant cost, requiring extensive time, practical knowledge, and resources to implement. This review will describe the technical features, advantages, and limitations of currently available multiplexed immunohistochemistry and spatial transcriptomic platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGinnis et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: