Key result
The use of a biodegradable C-seal to protect stapled colorectal anastomoses resulted in a 3% incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention.
Why the study?
Does the C-seal reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention in patients undergoing stapled colorectal anastomosis?
Observational (n=37)
Yes
Does the C-seal reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention in patients undergoing stapled colorectal anastomosis?
The use of a C-seal in stapled colorectal anastomoses was associated with a low rate (3%) of anastomotic leakage requiring reintervention.
PURPOSE: The present study was performed to get a better insight in the incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention when using the C-seal: a biodegradable sheath that protects the stapled colorectal anastomosis from leakage. METHODS: The C-seal is a thin walled tube-like sheath that forms a protective sheath within the bowel lumen. Thirty-seven patients undergoing surgery with creation of a stapled colorectal anastomosis with C-seal were analyzed. Follow-up was completed until 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: One patient (3%) developed anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention. None of the 37 anastomoses was dismantled. One patient was diagnosed with a rectovaginal fistula. In three patients (8%), a perianastomotic abscess spontaneously drained. CONCLUSION: The incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention when using the C-seal (3%) is lower than expected based on the literature (11%). We have currently set-up a multicenter randomized trial to confirm the efficiency of the C-seal (www.csealtrial.nl).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morks et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Colorectal anastomosis (n=37). C-seal was evaluated on Anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention. The use of a biodegradable C-seal to protect stapled colorectal anastomoses resulted in a 3% incidence of anastomotic leakage leading to reintervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: