This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We applied a momentum-selected photoelectron emission microscopy (PEEM) approach to image crystallographic domains in metallic thin films, even in the absence of chemical or work-function contrast. The method was employed to epitaxial Ir(111) films (∼60 nm) grown on sapphire(0001) by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) using a two-step temperature protocol followed by hydrogen annealing, which yielded high crystalline quality. X-ray diffraction confirmed the (111) orientation and the presence of twinning, and rocking-curve analysis revealed a sharp component with a full width at half maximum of 0.06°, reflecting high near-surface crystallinity. Atomic force microscopy showed a low surface roughness of ∼0.3 nm. Local momentum-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy using the photoelectron momentum microscope with a 5-µm field of view revealed large crystal domains with a single crystallographic orientation, extending over area of several hundred µm2. In addition, crystallographic symmetry yields mirror-symmetric momentum patterns for twin domains. Placing a contrast aperture at a selected point in momentum space and then switching to PEEM mode, we obtained complementary real-space images that resolve twin domains and their ∼120° linear boundaries—features that have been difficult to resolve with conventional PEEM owing to the negligible work-function contrast. Our results demonstrate that MBE-grown Ir(111) thin films exhibit high quality, approaching that of bulk Ir, and that we have established a growth method to achieve such films. Furthermore, the momentum-selected PEEM we used in this work provides a straightforward route to correlate reciprocal-space symmetry with real-space mapping of twin-domain structures in face-centered cubic metals.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimoto et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: