Key result
Mitral valve prolapse is linked to an eightfold higher rate of decreased von Willebrand factor.
Why the study?
The relationship between mitral valve prolapse and von Willebrand factor antigen levels and its clinical implications was unclear.
Are von Willebrand factor levels decreased in patients with mitral valve prolapse compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=54)
Are von Willebrand factor levels decreased in patients with mitral valve prolapse compared to controls?
Patients with mitral valve prolapse have significantly lower levels of von Willebrand factor, which may explain their increased incidence of epistaxis.
The levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF:Ag) were measured in 27 patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and compared to 27 age matched controls. Decreased levels of vWF:Ag (less than 80%) were found in 59% (16/27) of those with MVP compared to only 7% (2/27) of the controls (p less than 0.001). Mean vWF: Ag levels were also significantly lower in those with MVP (68 +/- 30% versus 100 +/- 23%, p less than 0.001). In those with MVP and congestive heart failure secondary to rupture chordae tendineae, however, the mean level of vWF: Ag was not significantly different from control values (95 +/- 32). There was an increased incidence of recurrent nose bleeds in those with MVP and low levels of vWF:Ag. We conclude that there is a relationship between MVP and low levels of vWF:Ag which may explain the increased incidence of epistaxis in such patients. Increased release of vWF:Ag in those with MVP and concomitant congestive heart failure may account for the normal levels found in this subgroup.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Froom et al. (1988) conducted a case-control in Mitral valve prolapse (n=54). Mitral valve prolapse vs. Age-matched controls was evaluated on Decreased levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF:Ag <80%) (p=<0.001). Mitral valve prolapse was associated with a significantly higher prevalence of decreased von Willebrand factor levels compared to age-matched controls (59% vs 7%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: