Why the study?
Surgical treatment of isolated pulmonary valve stenosis in infants and children has evolved from solely lowering right ventricle pressure to also preserving pulmonary valve function, but the impact of this shift on mid-term outcomes was unclear.
Do pulmonary valve sparing surgical techniques improve outcomes compared to older techniques in infants and children with isolated pulmonary valve stenosis?
Cohort (n=123)
No
Do pulmonary valve sparing surgical techniques improve outcomes compared to older techniques in infants and children with isolated pulmonary valve stenosis?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pulmonary valve sparing techniques in pediatric isolated pulmonary valve stenosis are associated with lower rates of right outflow tract reintervention compared to older surgical methods.
Background. Surgical treatment of isolated pulmonary valve stenosis in infants and children has evolved over the years, shifting from the original exclusive aim at lowering right ventricle pressure to the current concomitant focus on preserving pulmonary valve function. In our study, we sought to analyze the effect of such evolving philosophy on mid-term results.Methods. 123 consecutive patients were treated in our center between 07/1983 and 03/2019. Mean age and weight were 3.0 ± 0.36 years and 16.6 ± 1.7 kg, respectively. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on the onset of sparing valve techniques (1995). Short- and long-term mortality, freedom from reintervention on the right outflow tract, transvalvular mean pressure gradient decrease and pulmonary valve insufficiency were analyzed.Results. Early mortality occurred exclusively before 1995 (Group 1, 3.76%, p=ns). Transvalvular mean pressure gradient decreased in the entire patient population (from 63.28 ± 12.9 mmHg to 16.46 ± 7.9 mmHg), but right outflow tract reintervention rate was greater in Group 1 (14.10% vs 2.3%, p = 0.04). At a mean follow-up interval of 4.9 ± 33 years, pulmonary valve insufficiency was severe in 2.47% of patients in Group 1, whereas it was mild to moderate in 33.3% of patients in Group 2, the latter having undergone unsuccessful percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty prior to surgery in the vast majority of cases (14/20 vs 6/22, p=0.023).Conclusions. Current pulmonary valve sparing techniques are associated with better results, both in terms of survival and freedom from re-intervention at follow-up. Balloon valvuloplasty prior to surgery may worsen operative results, promoting pulmonary insufficiency and therefore should probably be avoided in all patients in whom anatomical characteristics predict failure of percutaneous therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Albanese et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Isolated pulmonary valve stenosis (n=123). Pulmonary valve sparing techniques vs. Non-sparing surgical techniques (pre-1995) was evaluated on Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reintervention (p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: