Key result
A bundled intervention approach in abdominal gynecological surgeries resulted in a 10% surgical site infection rate compared to 12% with routine care, a difference that was not statistically significant.
Why the study?
Does a bundled intervention reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries?
Cohort (n=100)
No
Does a bundled intervention reduce the incidence of surgical site infection in patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries?
Absolute Event Rate: 10% vs 12%
A bundled intervention approach for preventing surgical site infections in gynecologic surgeries is feasible and may slightly reduce SSI rates.
Hypothesis-generating for bundled SSI prevention in gynecologic surgery; larger randomized trials needed before adoption.
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is most common nosocomial infection (15%) among surgical patient’s and contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality. CDC (2015) provides “bundled intervention for prevention of SSI. The present study was planned to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of these bundled intervention in reducing SSI in our setup. Objectives of this study to study the effect of bundled interventions on SSI in gynaecologic surgery.Methods: A total 50 cases undergoing gynecological surgery in elective OT included in pilot group and bundled intervention followed these pilot group cases compared with 50 control group operated in same OT in which bundled intervention not followed outcome measures recorded were Incidence of SSI, type of SSI, need for antibiotic usage, need for secondary suturing, duration of hospital stay.Results: Out of 50 subjects in pilot group, five developed signs and symptoms of SSI giving an SSI rate of 10%. Out of those five, two had superficial SSI and three had deep SSI, none of the patient had organ space SSI.SSI rate in 50 cases operated in the same operating room during the same time period without use of bundled interventions (control group) was 12%.Conclusions: Bundled approach is easy and feasible in all setups. It adds only three extra minutes to the total duration of the surgery with risk reduction of SSI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Gynecological surgery (n=100). Bundled intervention vs. Routine surgical care was evaluated on Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). A bundled intervention approach in abdominal gynecological surgeries resulted in a 10% surgical site infection rate compared to 12% with routine care, a difference that was not statistically significant.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: