Key result
3D wall-motion tracking yields ~14% larger right atrial volumes than 2D-echo with weak correlation.
Why the study?
Current guidelines do not recommend routine assessment of right atrial volume due to lack of standardized reference data for echocardiographic measurements.
Does 3D-WMT echocardiography provide reproducible reference values for right atrial indexed volume compared to 2D echocardiography in healthy adults?
Observational (n=60)
Does 3D-WMT echocardiography provide reproducible reference values for right atrial indexed volume compared to 2D echocardiography in healthy adults?
3D-wall motion tracking is a feasible and reproducible method to determine right atrial volume, providing reference values for healthy adults.
3D wall-motion tracking may yield distinct right atrial volumes versus 2D; leaves open interchangeability and need for method-specific references before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not recommend routine assessment of right atrial volume due to the lack of standardized data. Three-dimensional wall-motion tracking (3D-WMT) is a new technology that allows us to calculate volumes without any geometric assumptions. The aim of this study was to define the indexed reference values for two-dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) and 3D-WMT in adult healthy population and to assess the intermethod, intra- and interobserver agreement. METHODS: Prospective study. Nonselected healthy subjects were enrolled. Every patient underwent a 2D-echo and a 3D-WMT examination. 2D-echo right atrial volume was obtained by using the area-length method (A-L) from four- and two-chamber view. 3D-echo volumes were assessed by 3D-WMT. Values were indexed by the patient's body surface area. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive healthy subjects were enrolled. Mean age was 57 ± 12-years old and 27 patients (45%) were male. Average indexed right atrial volume obtained by 2D-echo and 3D-echo was 16.76 ± 8.15 mL/m(2) and 19.05 ± 6.87 mL/m(2) , respectively. Univariate linear regression analysis between 2D-echo and 3D-echo right atrial volumes shows a weak correlation between right atrial volume obtained with 2D-echo compared with 3D-WMT (r = 0.29, CI 95% 0.029-0.66, P = 0.033). The agreement analysis shows a similar result (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.28). The intra- and interobserver agreement analysis showed a better agreement when using 3D-WMT. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that reports the reference indexed right atrial volume values by means of 2D-echo and 3D-echo in healthy population. 3D-WMT is a feasible and reproducible method to determine right atrial volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Healthy adults (n=60). Three-dimensional wall-motion tracking (3D-WMT) vs. Two-dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) was evaluated on Indexed right atrial volume (r = 0.29, 95% CI 0.029-0.66, p=0.033). Three-dimensional wall-motion tracking yielded an average indexed right atrial volume of 19.05 mL/m2 compared to 16.76 mL/m2 with 2D-echocardiography, showing weak correlation (r=0.29, P=0.033).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: