Why the study?
Does three-dimensional wall motion tracking (3D-WMT) echocardiography accurately measure left atrial volume compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients referred for CMR?
Population
70 consecutive patients referred for a cardiac magnetic resonance study, mean age 56 ± 18 years, 60% male.
Comparison
Three-dimensional wall motion tracking… vs Cardiac magnetic resonance as the reference…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
3D-WMT may support LA volume assessment when CMR is unavailable; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
Does three-dimensional wall motion tracking (3D-WMT) echocardiography accurately measure left atrial volume compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in patients referred for CMR?
3D-WMT echocardiography is a fast, accurate, and reproducible method for assessing left atrial volume that correlates well with CMR and outperforms standard 2D-echo.
Isla et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: