Key result
Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) derived left atrial biplane volume showed excellent correlation with manual delineation (r=0.98, p<0.001) and required only half the analysis time.
Why the study?
Does Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) accurately and reproducibly measure left atrial volume and function compared to manual delineation in patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance?
Observational (n=55)
Single-blind
Yes
Does Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) accurately and reproducibly measure left atrial volume and function compared to manual delineation in patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance?
Effect estimate: r = 0.98
Absolute Event Rate: 86.5% vs 84.4%
p-value: p=<0.001
Multimodality Tissue Tracking provides accurate and reproducible measurements of left atrial volume and function from CMR in about half the time of manual delineation, making it suitable for clinical and longitudinal use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MTT supports efficient, reproducible LA assessment in CMR research; leaves open routine clinical adoption pending larger trials.
Zareian et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease and healthy volunteers (n=55). Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) vs. Manual delineation was evaluated on Left atrial maximal volume (Vmax) correlation between MTT and manual delineation (r = 0.98, p=<0.001). Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) derived left atrial biplane volume showed excellent correlation with manual delineation (r=0.98, p<0.001) and required only half the analysis time.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: