Key result
MTT cuts left atrial biplane analysis time ~82% with high reproducibility versus manual delineation.
Why the study?
Left atrial volume and function are important cardiovascular markers but lack standardization in volume calculation methods and efficient quantification techniques.
Does Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) provide accurate, reproducible, and time-efficient left atrial structure and functional quantitation compared to manual delineation in subjects undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
Yes
Does Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) provide accurate, reproducible, and time-efficient left atrial structure and functional quantitation compared to manual delineation in subjects undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance?
Multimodality Tissue Tracking provides an accurate, highly reproducible, and less time-consuming alternative to manual delineation for left atrial structure and function quantitation on cardiac magnetic resonance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MTT LA tracking is feasible for volume assessment; leaves open standardization versus Simpson's methods in practice.
Left atrium (LA) volume and function are important markers of cardiovascular disease. LA volume can be assessed by several different methods. In clinical practice, the Simpson's method is well accepted as a reference standard, although there is no standardization for LA volume calculations. We aimed to compare the estimations of LA volume by the Simpson's method and the modified biplane Simpson's method; and to introduce Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT, Japan, Toshiba) as a new semi-automated method for quantifying LA function based on tissue feature tracking. Thirty subjects (mean age: 71.3 ± 8.7, 87% male) including twenty subjects with cardiovascular events (4 atrial fibrillation, 18 myocardial scar from late gadolinium enhancement, 2 heart failure) and ten healthy subjects, with CMR imaging were evaluated in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). LA volumes were measured using the modified biplane Simpson's method from 2- and 4-chamber projections and the original Simpson's method using short-axis slices. For the manual methods, LA endo- and epicardial boundaries were delineated at left-ventricular end-diastole (Vmin), end-systole (Vmax) and just before the pre-atrial contraction (VpreA). Using MTT, LA endocardial and epicardial borders were manually delineated at end-systole and the boundaries were propagated automatically throughout the cardiac cycle. LA total (LAEF = Vmax-Vmin/Vmax), active (LAAEF = VpreA-Vmin/VpreA) and passive ejection fraction (LAPEF =Vmax-VpreA/Vmax) were calculated (Figure 1 ). A two-tailed paired sample t-test is used to determine significant differences between two types of computations (Simpson's from short-axis images vs. Biplane Simpsons from long-axis images) and methods (MTT vs. manual). Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis are used to examine the relationship between the two computations and methods. In addition, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for inter and intra reader reproducibility are calculated. Multimodality Tissue Tracking, volume analysis . Subject with heart failure (Panel A) versus a healthy subject (Panel B).Vmax; maximal volume, VpreA; volume before pre-atrial contraction, Vmin; minimal volume. LA parameter analysis using the two different computations was significantly different for functional LA parameters by both methods (Table 1 ). LA functional parameters did not differ between manual and semi-automated methods (Table 1 ). LA volumes obtained from the Simpson's method was significantly different between manual and MTT methods (Table 1 ). Image analysis was less time consuming on average with MTT (Simpson's: MTT vs. manual: 3:10 min vs. 7:23 min; Biplane, MTT vs. manual: 1:30 min vs. 8:28 min). All parameters showed good to excellent intra and inter reader reproducibility (ICC; 0.69-0.99). MTT derived biplane LA structure and function is accurate, less time consuming, highly reproducible and could potentially be used in large studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zareian et al. (2014) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=30). Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) semi-automated method vs. Manual delineation (Simpson's method and modified biplane Simpson's method) was evaluated on Left atrial functional parameters (LAEF, LAPEF, LAAEF) and image analysis time. Multimodality Tissue Tracking (MTT) provided accurate and highly reproducible left atrial structure and function quantification compared to manual delineation, while reducing biplane image analysis time from 8:28 minutes to 1:30 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: